Transcending Place and Time in Mirror for Man :: Mirror for Man Essays

Transcending Place and Time in Mirror for Man In the given personation from Mirror for Man, Clyde Kluckhorn explains the similarities and differences between finiss by first defining the anthropological concept of culture and then explaining his definition. The definition Kluckhorn gives relies heavily on common sense. Culture is the union life way of a people, the social legacy individuals acquire from their group. Or culture can be regarded as that part of the environment that is the creation of humankind beings. By giving us this definition, Kluckhorn immediately deletes any chance of mininterpreting the word and concept of culture. Kluckhorn starts his explanation of this definition by simplifying the concept. He says that a persons acts cannot be explained unless in terms of biology, the life experiences of that person, and/or the immediate situation. Instead the past experience of other people in the form of culture enters into almost whole(prenominal) event. It is not we who determine our culture, but our ancestors who determined for us. Kluckhorn is saying that who we are -- our culture -- is based on how the people who have the responsibility of raising us were raised by their region models, who were influenced by their role models, and so on. To illustrate his point, Kluckhorn gives examples of times when the culture someone was raised in plays a major role in determining how the person will react in a given situation -- often how they will react to an aspect of another culture. The examples all showed that ones own culture is where one feels safest. Kluckhorns illustrations of how people react negatively to other cultures seems to prove the axiom that mans biggest fear is of change. Despite the almost overwhelming influences of culture, there is fluid human nature to consider. Basically, all human being are the same. All are similar in biology and in that they must observe the carnal laws of nature. Yet the differences between cultur es stem from the once original, individual ways of dealing with these problems. Man and his problems are universly the same, but it is his dealing with these problems that is different, and these dealings are determined by the predecessors of each culture. This is the very essence of how Kluckhorn explains the anthropological differences and similarities between cultures. As for my views, I agree with Professor Kluckhorn wholeheartedly although all of my experience has been in the American culture with various subcultures.