Charlemagne :: essays research papers

CharlemagneThere was relatively little commerce in western sandwich Europe. Roads, bridges, and the infrastructure generally were non-existent. Furthermore, the countryside was unsafe for travel due to a lose of organized law enforcement. Small villages had to take care of themselves therefore, manufacturing was carried on solely to the extent that was needed to supply local needs.In the little domains or principalities, the lands over which a King ruled were regarded as no variant from other property. Among the Franks, all sons were entitled to a share. Therefore, when a King died, from each one son became a King over his own little kingdom. Thus, umteen political units became small so there were no uniform laws or policies. This lack of unity made them vulnerable to enemies as well as conflict from within. Bullough points bulge that the loyalty of a warrior or subject to his elect leader was not a light matter. The author does not cable that concept of loyalty however, with our present ideas of loyalty to the homeland or institution. The apprenticeship of a King describes how Charlemagne gained power through conquest and diplomacy. In 768, King Pippin died and his kingdom was divided between his two sons. Charles, the elder, and the younger was Carloman. The author says that little is know of Charles boyhood. When he was of the right age, it is recorded that he worked eagerly at horseback riding and hunting. It was the custom of the Franks to ride and be practiced in the use of fortify and ways of hunting. We may evidenceably infer that acquiring these skills formed a major part of his early education. Charles was not a man of garner and the author makes no attempt at explaining this other than to point out that literacy was considered unimportant at that time for anyone other than the clergy and Charles didnt become fire in letters until later in life. Bullough explains a itemise of experiences in public duties and responsibilities, which were assigned to Charles by his father, thus, giving him an apprenticeship to rule the kingdom. For some reason tension between Charles and his brother began shortly after their accession. The author explains a number of conflicts. The younger brother died however, at the end of 771 and a number of prominent people in his kingdom offered allegiance to Charles. Bullough names and explains those subjects. The consequent was the re-uniting of those territories, which helped to establish the kingdom of the Franks.