Battered Wife Syndrome: Definition and Stages

BWS recognised as important in providing legal vindication to dupes and as basis for diag no.is and treatwork forcet. However, there has been confusion as to the rendering of BWS such as the use of effect committed against the char as the defining characteristic. The study introduced by handcart (1984) demonstrates cycle of fury and lettered helplessness to strike women. (Seligman, 1993) In addition, studies piece out that BWS, manifested in a throw of depression, low self-esteem, anxiety, physical symptoms, is evident in close to mistreated women putting them at risk of suicide and homicide.Symptoms attributed to strike may in addition be a result of tensity from a troubled relationship. The acquire Helplessness and Grief Theory (Campbell, 1989) explains the depression in beat-up women. Moreover, researchers be in disagreement of the eventors that affect the level of trauma such as frequency of abuse, educational status and severity of sexual and emotional abuse. The discommode on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and larn helplessness in BWS remained unresolved.Some researchers impression batter women in the context of subsisters rather than victims. Furthermore, studies prove that buffet women attend decimal points of abuse where the manifestations of BWS are part of the steps to conflict resolution. Based on these descriptions and findings, it is clear that not all battered women experience BWS. Although widely misunderstood even among legal professionals, battered woman syndrome is not a legal defense. It is one approach to explaining battered womens experiences.Like other(a) social manikin testimony, ( Vidmar & Schuller, in press ), expert testimony concerning battering and its effects is employ in the legal system to help a judge or jury better understand a battered womans experience ( Federal Rules of Evidence 702 ). buffet Womens Syndrome considered a induce of Post-Traumatic Stress. knock about Womens Syndrome is a reco gnized psychological condition apply to describe someone who has been the victim of concordant or severe internal violence. To classify as a battered woman, a woman has to vex been through with(predicate) dickens cycles of abuse.A Cycle of abuse is abuse that occurs in a repeating convention. Abuse is identifiable as macrocosm cyclical in devil ways it is both generational and episodic. Generational cycles of abuse passed down, by example and exposure, from parents to children. Episodic abuse occurs in a repeating pattern within the context of at least two individuals within a family system. It may involve spousal abuse, child abuse, or even elder abuse. There are mainly four stages in the battered womens syndrome. Stage OneDenial Stage one of battered womens syndromes occurs when the battered woman denies to others, and to herself, that there is a problem.Most battered women will disembowel up excuses for why their partners permit an disgraceful incident. Battered wom en will generally believe that the abuse will never happen again. Stage cardinalGuilt Stage two of battered womens syndrome occurs when a battered woman truly recognizes or acknowledges that there is a problem in her relationship. She recognizes she has been the victim of abuse and that she may be beaten again. During this stage, most battered women will take on the blame or responsibility of each beatings they may receive.Battered women will begin to mind their own characters and try harder to racy up their partners expectations. Stage Three-Enlightenment Stage three of battered womens syndrome occurs when a battered woman draws to understand that no one deserves to be beaten. A battered woman comes to see that the beatings she receives from her partner are not justified. She similarly recognizes that her partner has a serious problem. However, she stays with her maltreater in an undertake to keep the relationship in tact with hopes of future change.Stage Four righteousness Stage four of battered womens syndrome occurs when a battered woman recognizes that her abuser has a problem that wholly he can fix. Battered women in this stage come to understand that nothing they can do or say can help their abusers. Battered women in this stage choose to take the necessary steps to leave their abusers and begin to start new lives. BWS is a psychological reaction that occurs in normal pile who are exposed to repeated trauma such as family or domesticated violence. It includes three groups of symptoms that assist the mind and body in preparing to fight back against threats.Psychologists call it the fight or flight response. The Fight Response stylus In the fight mode, the body and mind prepare to deal with endangerment by becoming hyper vigilant to cues of potential violence, resulting in an exaggerated part response. The automatic nervous system becomes operational and the individual becomes more cerebrate on the single task of self-defense. This impairs concentration and causes physiological responses usually associated with game anxiety. In serious cases, fearfulness and panic disorders are present and phobic disorders may result.Irritability and crying are typical symptoms of this stage. The Flight Response humour The flight response mode often alternates with the fight pattern. Most individuals would take in away from danger if they could do so safely. When physical escape is actually or perceived as impossible, then mental escape occurs. This is the turning away or emotional numbing stage where denial, minimization, rationalization and disassociation subconsciously used as ways to psychologically escape from the threat or presence of violence.Cognitive Ability and Memory Loss The third major allude of BWS is to the cognitive and memory areas where the victim begins to have meddling memories of the abuse or may actually develop psychogenic amnesia and not everlastingly remember important details or events. The victim ha s trouble next his or her thoughts in a logical way, distracted by intrusive memories that may be flashbacks to previous battering incidents. The victim disassociates himself or herself when face with painful events, memories, reoccurring nightmares or other associations not readily apparent to the observer.American womens rightist and psychologist Lenore baby carriage coined the term Battered woman syndrome. It is based on two fundamental premises a cycle model of violence and learned helplessness. In 1978 to 1981, she interviewed 435 female victims of domestic violence. Walker (1984) concluded that the violence goes in cycles. Each cycle consists of three stages Tension building stage, when a victim suffers verbal abuse or minor physical violence, standardised slaps. At this stage, the victim may attempt to pacify the abuser. However, the victims passivity may reinforce the abusers violent tendencies.Acute battering incident At this stage, both perceived and real danger of be ing assassinateed or seriously injured is maximal. Loving contrition After the abuser discharged his tension by battering the victim, his attitude changes. He may apologize for the incident and promise to change his air in the future. The repetition of this cycle over time, connect to the undermining of womens self-belief take a shit a smirch of learned helplessness whereby the woman feels trapped in a sulphurous built in bed in which she may fight back with lethal consequences.Early readying of battered woman syndrome referred to the cycle of violence (Walker, 1984), a theory that describes the kinetics of the batterers behavior. The cycle of violence theory used to explain how battered victims are drawn back into the relationship when the abuser is contrite and captive following the violence. More recently, battered woman syndrome has been defined as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Walker, 1992), a psychological condition that results from exposure to severe trau ma.Among other things, PTSD can explain why a battered victim may react, because of flashbacks and other intrusive experiences resulting from prior victimization, to a new situation as dangerous, even when it is not. There are a number of criticisms tell at the use of battered woman syndrome, both in a legal context and in clinical environments. BWS as defined by Walker (1984) may be set apart from the majority of recognized disorders in that it describes the behavioral and psychological characteristics of not only the victim, but similarly the perpetrator.By working her analysis of the psychology of the perpetrator into her cycle of violence, it is arguable Walker purports to draw both victim and perpetrator into her diagnosis (McMahon 1999). Critics claim that Walkers theory (1984) does not explain the use uping of abusive partners. If a battered female suffers from learned helplessness, she would, by definition, behave passively (Griffith, 1995) with the prompting that the mo del of a battered spouse as a survivor proposed by Gondolf (1988) might be more realistic. Killing abusive partners is not passive behavior, so it contradicts, rather than promotes, Walkers theory.Nor is the killing of abusing partners consistent with Walkers theory of cyclical violence. Wilson and Daly (1992) have compute the sex ratio for spouse killing using selective info from England and Wales 1977-86. For every 100 men who kill wives 23 women kill husbands. 120 women were killed by male partners in 1992 40% of all female homicides in England and Wales are women killed by partners the figure for men is 6%. Wilson and Dalys (1994) Canadian entropy show that 26% of women killed were divorced or separated at the time, Australian data (Wallace 1986) as some(prenominal) as 45% in underway South Wales had left or were in the process of leaving.Accurate official data on women who kill is, as Celia Wells (1994) has pointed out, difficult to access and incomplete. She presents in formation on 200 women charged during 1984-92. 46 were exonerate 14 on self-defense, a further 98 were institute guilty of manslaughter 38 were found guilty of murder and the outcomes were unknown in 55 cases. She notes that more women acquitted or receive a manslaughter verdict than men, but that this does not believe that are no gendered injustices in the legal process. Cynthia Gillespie (1989) cites a study 29 US cases where BWS was used, only 9 resulted in acquittals.The language in many of the US cases shows that courts understand BWS as a new and excusable form of female irrationality (Gillespie, 1989). A conviction for murder means two things a label and a mandatory life sentence. The promoted abolition of the life sentence would only address the second point, and would not necessarily create justice for women convicted of murder, since the tariffs given by judges for many women have been at the higher end of the scale. Studies of women who kill (Browne, 1987) in the US have found that they have experienced repeated and life threatening violence, with a great frequency of coerced sex.Almost all the women had also attempted to leave and elicit the support of other agencies in their struggles to end violence. Nothing they have attempted has halt the violence, and many talk of reaching a point where they believe only one of them can survive. The leading case in Canada is that of RV Lavallee that the irresponsible Court heard in 1989. The woman shot her husband in the back during a violent incident, and her plea of self-defense accepted on appeal, BWS evidence presented to the point that she was one who could not escape and saw no options for survival.(Martha Shaffer, 1990) Judge Wilson made some telling and important points in her judgment that womens actions judged in the context of her reality. It is not for the jury to mold to pass judgment on the fact that the accused stayed in the relationship. steady less is it entitled to conclude that she forfeited her right to self-defense for having through so. The courts in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States have accepted the extensive and growing body of research showing that battered partners can use force to defend themselves.In addition, sometimes kill their abusers because of the abusive and sometimes life-threatening situation in which they find themselves, acting in the firm belief that there is no other way than to kill for self-preservation. The courts have recognized that this evidence may support a motley of defenses to a charge of murder or to mitigate the sentence if convicted of lesser offences (Faigman, David L1986) Self-defense when using a reasonable and proportionate degree of violence in response to the abuse might appear the most provide defense but, until recently, it almost never succeeded.Maguigan (1991) argues that self-defense is genders biased both in its nature and in the way trial judges apply it. BWS directiones on wome ns responses to violence, rather the context of violence in the relationship. It thus diverts forethought from the previous behavior of the man, and the danger he represented. The case thus turns on womens personality defects rather than the mans behavior.The central question becomes why women stay, which she is not on trial for, whilst the more important questions of why men continue to use violence, refuse to let women leave and the bereavement of agencies to intervene to laterality violence and protect women are lost. These issues are the ones current international research highlights as central to the contexts in which battered women kill and are killed. The battering cycle is by no means popular Walker (1984) herself failed to find it in a third of her interviews some men for example are never contrite, never apologies and rule the household through a reign of terror.BWS emphasizes upond women, rather than women who perceive themselves to be, and in fact be, acting compet ently, assertively and rationally in the light of alternatives. The legal focus becomes trying to find an excuse rather than a justification linked to a reasonable act. Conclusion Womens resistance to violence and control is minimized, if not made logically impossible. Research now suggests that in some relationships violence continues precisely because women resist mens controlling behavior (Kelly 1988, Lundgren 1986).The deaths of men and women are preventable if domestic violence is taken seriously, and that ought to be our primary goal. Creating appropriate defenses for women who kill in desperation is a damage limitation rather than a prevention strategy. It is more than obvious that judges, lawyers and juries look at access to the most up to date knowledge about domestic violence in order to counteract the stereotypes and misinformation that has predominated to date. However, are most psychologists and psychiatrists old(prenominal) with state of the knowledge?REFERENCESBrown e, A. (1987) When Battered Women Kill, The Free Press, New York. Campbell, Jacquelyn C ( 1995). omen of Homicide of and by Battered Women. In Jacquelyn C. Campbell (ed. ) Assessing Dangerousness Violence by Sexual Offenders, Batterers, and shaver Abusers. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Daly, Kathleen (1994).Feminism and Criminology. Justice Quarterly 5499-535 Gillespie, Cynthia K. (1990).Justifiable Homicide Battered Women, Self Defense, and the legality Ohio Ohio State University Press. Gondolf, E. F. (1988).Battered Women as Survivors An Alternative to Treating larn Helplessness. Lexington, Mass. Lexington Books. Griffith, M. (1995).Battered woman syndrome a tool for batterers? Fordham Law Review. Vol. 64(1) pp141-198. Faigman, David L. (1986).Battered woman Syndrome and Self Defense A Legal and Empirical Dissent. Virginia Law Review, vol. 72, no. 3 619-647. Federal Rules of Evidence 702 Kelly,Liz, Lundgren, Eva (1988).How Women Define Their Experiences of Violence. In Kersti Yll o and Michele Bograd (eds. ) Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse. Newbury Park, CA Sage Martha Shaffer, (1990).Rv. Lavallee A Review Essay 22 Ottawa L. Rev. 607 Maguigan, H. (1991).Battered Women and Self-Defense Myths and Misconceptions in Current Reform Proposals, University of protactinium Law Review, 140(2) 379-486. McMahon, M. (1999).Battered women and bad science the limited validity and usefulness of battered woman syndrome. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, Vol. 6(1) pp 23-49 Seligman, Martin. (1993).Learned Helplessness A Theory for the shape up of Personal Control, Oxford Oxford University Press. Vidmar, N. and Schuller, R. A. (1989).Juries and expert evidence. Social framework testimony. Law and Contemporary Problems , 133. Walker, Lenore E. (1984).The Battered Woman. New York Harper and Row. Walker, L. E. (1977-78). Battered women and learned helplessness. Victimology an International Journal. 2(3/4), 525-534. Walker, L. E. (1992).Battered women syndrome and self-defens e. Symposium on Women and the Law, Notre chick Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy, 6(2), 321-334. Wallace, H. (1994).Battered Women Syndrome Self-Defence and Duress as needful Defences? Police Journal, vol. 67, no. 2 133-139 Wells, Celia (1993).Battered Woman Syndrome and Defences to Homicide Journal of Law and Society 24 (1993), 427-437 Wilson, Nanci Koser. (1993).Gendered Interaction in Criminal Homicide. In Anna capital of Seychelles Wilson (ed. ) Homicide The Victim-Offender Connection Cincinnati, OH Anderson.