'Beowulf and The 13th Warrior Essay\r'

'Beowulf and the thirteenth Warrior, both(prenominal) atomic number 18 rattling strong stories, unrivalled decipherably and the other visually (unless you go to the grow of the thirteenth Warrior and read Eaters of the Dead). Although it is middling lucid to bothone who has read Beowulf that the 13th Warrior was based on this great epic, in that respect argon becalm several differences that make for an interesting fold or two.\r\nWhile the two stories be very more than alike in several ways, they are in addition very different. One of the key differences that the reader/ spectator commemorates right discharge is that the bill of Beowulf is being told exclusively close Beowulf and his antics… almost in a third person view. The 13th warrior, on the other hand, is being told by a participant (Antonio Banderas who plays Ahmed Ibn Fahdlan) in the perform about the symbolic Beowulf character. Antonio Banderas or Ahmed Ibn Fadlan, is an Arabian ambassador fro m Baghdad whose whole train in going is to interact with and percolate as much as he can about the â€Å"odd” and â€Å" uncultivated” ways of the Vi forces. Although he starts out pretty upset, almost horrified, about how the North custody carry on with their barbaric customs and almost realize lack of hygiene of almost any anatomy. The reason that Antonio Banderas’s character is level off part of the baloney is that the Vikings’ loss leader, Buliwyf, needs a 13th man that cannot be a northman to be included in his posse comitatus of adventurers.\r\nThe goal of the adventurers is to report to an aging â€Å" queen regnant Hrothgar” and help him to protect his people from a tribe of savages (you almost think that they as wellspring are â€Å"supernatural” because thither are never any of their wild left after battle and they are continually riding around in bear skins that give them a positively frightening appearance in the overca st and at night) that are causing an un lookd amount of terror (I’d be pretty scared too if I walked into a fri suppress’s confine and him and his family were cut up into pieces) and completely destroying the race; Grendel is the embodiment of all of the savages, while his nevertheless having himself, he so terribly diminish the population and established such a re perpetrateation, that he successfully made king Hrothgar move out of his prized mead hall.\r\nWhile there are several similarities in the stories, one very important detail to notice is the parallel between Mr. Buliwyf and Beowulf (both of them are leading of soldiers and they both rush to the aid of a troubled king whose kingdom is in danger). On top of, both of these leadership of men make it their mission to go and kill the â€Å" let” (â€Å"mother” of the savages and Grendel’s mother).\r\nIn Beowulf, the hero actually fought and killed Grendel (â€Å"eaters of the deathlyâ € leader and savages combined) first and indeed when his mother (â€Å"mother” of the â€Å"eaters of the dead”) came and took away his ashes to her home in the lake, Beowulf followed and then killed her as well… subdued I job the order doesn’t really amour.\r\n other issue to notice is the parallel in â€Å"supernatural” happenings and traits in the two stories.\r\nIn Beowulf, he had supernatural strength, there was no one and nothing in the demesne that was strong than he was (he tore Grendel away… literally, and Grendel was a demon which I imagine is no easy feat). The parallel to that in The 13th Warrior was how scour after Buliwyf was poisoned further before he cut off the â€Å"mother’s” head, he let off was able to fight through the toxic haze and muster the strength (even though everyone thought he was pretty much dead in the town hall) when the beat came, and fight off the vengeance being sought by the à ¢â‚¬Å"eaters of the dead” for cleanup spot their â€Å"mother.”\r\nAfter he dispatched with a duette of savages, he swings his sword at the leader and doesn’t just hit him and ping him off (he’s wearing actors assistant armor so the sword doesn’t cut him in half), he has becoming strength not only to generate and knock the leader off his horse, but makes him fly off about 10 feet in the opposite direction that he was originally trying to go to last to Buliwyf.\r\nThe comparison of the way that the fighting men in each of the stories look at fighting is also interesting. In both stories, pride and boasting and â€Å"manliness” plays a very important component in the way things are done. Whether you fight or not seems to directly impact whether you are a â€Å"man” or not. The warrior jurisprudence is an imperative part of any good epic, or war story in general… there has to be a â€Å"good” guy that, no matter how bad what he does is, follows some correct of honor code, that is an integral part of a good story.\r\nAnother very intelligible difference is that in the 13th Warrior, Mr. Ahmed Ibn Fahdlan is not the master(prenominal) character of the story, whereas in Beowulf, Beowulf is evidently the one the story is about. As the peach watches the 13th Warrior, they will notice that Antonio Banderas serves as the focal top/narrator of the film, even though the story is not about him. This fact becomes painfully overt towards the end of the movie, just before the climactic battle, where the main character (the one that is symbolic of Beowulf), Buliwyf, indirectly asks Antonio to write down the story (Mr. Banderas actually seems to offer to copy it down so that their story is not forgotten) and Ahmed Ibn Fahdlan says it will be done (you get the feeling it’s almost a â€Å"get well” gift because Buliwyf is going to die from poison). So, condescension not being the main chara cter, he plays a very important role… not only in the write down of the story but also because he is the reason they were able to put down the savages.\r\nOne very obvious difference (not sure what the directors were thinking) was that there was sort of a miniature love story sort of randomly thrown into The 13th Warrior. There really seems to be no point to it, it really has nothing to do at all with the main point of the movie… possibly it was a frail attempt to attract a young-bearing(prenominal) crowd (despite the gore) by claiming that it was, in part, a love story. Overall, it causes one to get disconcert from the point… and it just creates more questions then it answers.\r\nWhile one story is obviously a remake of the other, they still constitute their own, very acute, differences. And while the 13th Warrior doesn’t nearly come close to being as good of a story as it could have, and there are still several parallels with Beowulf that mad it enjo yable (obviously aside from the action which would make it enjoyable anyway).\r\n'